Tag - linux

Entries feed

Tuesday, September 30 2008, 05:37 am

Ancient Computers Recycled


Usually I have a piece of computer hardware that I must have, but usually I don't get it right away. I wait until it's marked down from MSRP. Sometimes that wait is five years long. In that case, I upgraded my main server from a 1.13ghz Tualatin to a 1.4ghz, which was the fastest made. This process required me to also upgrade the motherboard since all but a few supported anything beyond a 1.2ghz Tualatin. Why would I do this? First off, the entire upgrade cost me $40 without shipping. Secondly, I was always facinated by the Tualatin CPU line, as nerdy as that might sound. So after having to dust off my floppy drive in the closet (because I also had to upgrade the motherboard BIOS), I finally got the computer upgraded. Then I tried booting without a keyboard. While the Intel motherboard I had previously booted without a problem, this ASUS motherboard will not. "Keyboard error. Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue." *sigh*

Wednesday, April 2 2008, 09:30 pm

Computer Boot-up Times are the Devil

All of our advanced technology usually has one drawback. How long does it take to start up? This may range from a few seconds, but in the case of a computer it falls in the range of a few minutes. Hardware has to be initialized and configured for use and that takes time. Are there ways to alleviate that time? Yes!

bootchart

Tweaking boot times is no light matter, and you will need to have some knowledge about how a computer works internally. I'll be referencing Linux to begin with and Windows to conclude. There's a nice tool to visualize boot times called bootchart that displays each process that runs during the boot process. This ingenious tool can pinpoint locations of high latency, but you the user will have to work on fixing any problems. Linux distributions, such as Fedora, are using this tool to speed up boot times and will show benefits in Fedora 9, which is due to be released in a few weeks. The tool will continue to be used as to prevent regressions and further speed up boot times. My own personal usage of this tool allowed me to shave off 10 seconds by disabling the Red Hat Graphical Boot program. On the other side of the island, things are not so bright. Sure, Microsoft gives it a good go at limiting boot up time, but it isn't customizable or configurable. There isn't much else to say about it simply because there's nothing you can do about it. Usually a network driver causes longer delays and you're stuck at the animated scroll bar for extra unnecessary seconds. However, in the future it may be possible to have next to nothing boot times as we will have dozens of CPU cores and hyper fast solid state drives.

Tuesday, April 1 2008, 09:24 pm

Sound Cards should be Creative Hardware

It wouldn't be the Internet without something to be disgruntled about. The latest craze seems to be Creative's handling of an incident involving a community effort to provide working driver packages for Creative's sound cards under Windows operating systems. Long story short, a community user had put together a driver package that allowed your sound card you purchased to work under Windows and Creative decided to pull a Cease and Desist order. The end result seems to be an outcry to boycott all Creative products. So, what else would you buy?

For the past 20 or so years (a long time in Computing), Creative has dominated the sound card market. The only supported sound card in most software was a Creative one. However, with the introduction of the AC'97 specification in 1997, that changed slightly. Now there was a universal standard for sound card makers to write to and have broad support in software. Large numbers of third party sound chips were now in circulation and Creative's stronghold was buckling. Did they do anything to expand or stabilize their business? Nope. They continued to manufacture cards that worked with proprietary acceleration techniques (EAX) to keep their enthusiast market in place. An updated sound chip specification came just recently in the fashion of the Intel HD spec. This upped the requirements for sound quality and made onboard sound a reality when it came to decent sound processing. Both standards allowed all operating systems to easily integrate and have a driver for basic sound, so you could easily get sound without worrying if your new computer would work.

asus-xonar-d2 Out of those standards and companies grew a few external cards. Currently the most notable is the Asus Xonar series of cards. They offer a quality chipset and package for similar prices to the Creative line, yet have none of the driver issues. A Linux driver is also available, which is a plus. Sure there's a non-open source Creative X-Fi driver for Linux, if you can get it to work. So with Creative out of the way, here's to hoping that the sound card world, which has been rather quiet over the years, can come springing to life; cross-platform and working uniformly as all consumers should come to expect from their hardware.

Wednesday, March 19 2008, 09:03 pm

Linux... and You!

Linux-penguinThe world is never the same place for more than 10 seconds. Why should those boundaries stop at computer software? Ask yourself this when you wonder why people would use an operating system other than Microsoft's Windows, Apple's OS X, Sun's Solaris, SCO's OpenServer, etc. The general public has been stuck with newspaper clippings and TV reports about the computing world. This left them with the assumption that computing started and stopped with the Windows logo, the Apple logo, etc. As long as the computer functioned enough to let them work, they were satisfied; however, notice my diction. Now that broadband has reached almost every home, consumers are branching out and learning that computers are more than just tools for word processing. The boundaries they were accustomed to were artificially set in place by classical marketing techniques of those with power of commercial software enterprises, and are now broken down with the fluidity of information pouring in from websites across the Internet. If none of my previous sentence made any sense to you, I feel you are still trapped in a box from a retail store. I suggest you get a box cutter and metaphorically cut yourself out of it. Use a free operating system!

Yes, I realize there are dozens of statements similar to my own, however, I wish to differ in their points with reaching out at the facts of life, rather than strictly matters of opinion. The rest of this post is targeted at baseline consumers and the IT infrastructure of corporations everywhere (not for employees). The freedom that is brought with open, free software is always underestimated. People cannot imagine a life without Windows. From my own experiences growing up, I was instinctively stuck in a Windows rut from DOS 6.2, Win 3.1, Win 95, 98, ME, 2000, and XP. AOL, to the Internet. I used Internet Explorer religously until 6.0 and always had PC games instead of consoles. I have seen these same thoughts residing in my friends, family, and co-workers. Corporate software companies have a perfect grasp around the necks of countless consumers. The old saying "If it ain't broke, why fix it?" rings true here, but I have an answer to that question. As most people recognize in my character, I have a knack for being curious, and the corporate software world couldn't fill my curiosity as American politics can't fill Amercian needs. This lack of innovation, along with money, are just two reasons of many, but they are the most important of them all and the only ones worth mentioning without boring you half to death. You're already halfway by now, so I don't want to kill you before you got to the end.

The world changes every 10 seconds and so should you, unless you like sitting on the couch all day, but then you wouldn't be reading this so I have you covered. Corporate software is based on the requirement of meeting requests that have the highest bid. Cash is everything, and this is the number one reason why you should look else where. Abandoning the software you have used forever (and emptied your wallet on) is the first step of cutting yourself out of those boundaries. If you are stuck on the fact that you need Microsoft Word, Adobe Photoshop, or Crysis, you need to seek professional help. There is no sarcasm here. The future computing world is about freedom and choice, not boxes with price tags. This is not a matter of opinion, as what I speak of has been happening for the past decade. The movement of free software has been small and quiet, but it has not faltered or missed one step.

To make that second step and completely exit the box, you have to change the core of your computer software as well - the operating system. I will not, in this post, recommend that everyone go out and download a Linux distribution and blow up their hard drives and install it; it's silly, and no one should ever mention it. In hind sight, I will dictate that consumers read about the options that Linux, and other open operating systems bring to the table. A fine example of this learning process can be seen in my friends and family whom I've shown Linux too. They initially were weirded out, but that's completely normal. After they used it, they found the same simple operating processes worked the way they knew them, and adapted to oddities as they used the system. What I've shown them is only about 5% of the Linux world. The other 95% is another made up Internet percentage, which is largely unexplored even by myself. It would also take a few hundred blog posts to explain more than I've spilled out here, and I may continue in the future, but that would require you, the consumer, to start cutting out of that box first.

vistalinux

Before I hear some thirteen year old pizza-face tell me that Windows is "easy" and "lolz better," or from a fourty-year-old IT guy whose job it is to clean mouse lint, I wish to remind them that they failed the reading comprehension test of this post and they should be beaten with a stick. The same learning principles apply to Windows as does any computing software. If you picked up a native from deep in the Amazon jungle and threw Windows Vista at them, would you dare refute the fact that it wouldn't be that easy for that individual? If you would, you only support my second opinion - I hate people.

page 2 of 2 -